Wednesday, December 10, 2014

AEFIS: 2015 Academic Evaluation Feedback Intervention System

CHEA: 2015 Higher Education Accreditation Toolkit

Directory of CHEA - Recognized Higher Education Accrediting Organizations

CHEA Recognized Organizations

The accrediting organizations identified in this directory are recognized by the
Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA). Recognition by CHEA
affirms that the standards and processes of the accrediting organization are
consistent with the academic quality, improvement and accountability expectations
that CHEA has established, including the eligibility standard that the majority
of institutions or programs each accredits are degree-granting.

President Obama’s 2015 Budget Adds Funds for Higher Education

American Council on Education - Response to Supporting Academic Freedom Through Regulatory Relief Act

President Obama Speaks at the Dec. 2014 - College Opportunity Summit

Published on Dec 4, 2014On December 4, 2014, President Obama delivered remarks at the College Opportunity Summit at the Ronald Reagan Building in Washington, D.C.

Tuesday, December 9, 2014

AEFIS - Attends WEEF - World Engineering Education Forum in Dubai Dec 2014

AEFIS: CEO Mustafa Sualp and Dir. Operations Caitlin Meehan at WEEF - World Engineering Education Forum in Dubai Dec. 3-6 2014

About Weef 2014 - Following in the footsteps of WEEF 2010 in Singapore and WEEF 2012 in Buenos Aires, the 2014 World Engineering Education Forum is bringing together a whole array of activities.

The Forum combines a number of international engineering education conferences, and promises to be the largest ever conference on engineering education.

WEEF 2014 Conference Overview 
Under the theme “Engineering Education for a Global Community”, The World Engineering Education Forum – WEEF 2014 – will include over 70 multidisciplinary sessions, bringing together the world most renowned experts to address the latest innovation, advances, technology, issues and challenges in engineering education.

Wednesday, November 12, 2014

2014 - Recognized Accrediting Associations from ☛ AEFIS ☛ Higher Ed. ☛ Assessment ☛ Continuous Improvement ☛ Web Based ☛ System

This chart lists regional, national faith-related, national career-related and programmatic accreditors that are or have been recognized by the Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA) or the U.S. Department of Education (USDE) or both. Organizations identified by ( • ) are recognized; (–) indicates those not currently recognized. An asterisk (*) identifies accrediting organizations that were formerly recognized

2014 - Types of Higher Education Accreditation: What's the Difference?

Types of Accreditation: What's The Difference!
To be accredited, a school or program undergoes a review by an accrediting organization. Institutional accreditors review entire colleges, universities or vocational schools. Programmatic accreditors review programs in areas ranging from the health professions to engineering.

Can Higher Education Accreditation Keep Up With Change?

Tuesday, October 14, 2014

New Technology Is Turning Education Upside Down

             Students in a lecture hall at the Missouri School Of Journalism

Higher education is one of the great successes of the welfare state. 
What was once the privilege of a few has become a middle-class entitlement, thanks mainly to government support. Some 3.5m Americans and 5m Europeans will graduate this summer. 
In the emerging world universities are booming: China has added nearly 30m places in 20 years. Yet the business has changed little since Aristotle taught at the Athenian Lyceum: young students still gather at an appointed time and place to listen to the wisdom of scholars.
Now a revolution has begun (see "The future of universities: The digital degree"), thanks to three forces: rising costs, changing demand and disruptive technology. The result will be the reinvention of the university.

Off Campus, Online

Higher education suffers from Baumol's disease--the tendency of costs to soar in labour-intensive sectors with stagnant productivity. Whereas the prices of cars, computers and much else have fallen dramatically, universities, protected by public-sector funding and the premium employers place on degrees, have been able to charge ever more for the same service. For two decades the cost of going to college in America has risen by 1.6 percentage points more than inflation every year.
For most students university remains a great deal; by one count the boost to lifetime income from obtaining a college degree, in net-present-value terms, is as much as $590,000 (see page 74). But for an increasing number of students who have gone deep into debt--especially the 47% in America and 28% in Britain who do not complete their course--it is plainly not value for money. And the state's willingness to pick up the slack is declining. In America government funding per student fell by 27% between 2007 and 2012, while average tuition fees, adjusted for inflation, rose by 20%. In Britain tuition fees, close to zero two decades ago, can reach £9,000 ($15,000 a year).
The second driver of change is the labour market. In the standard model of higher education, people go to university in their 20s: a degree is an entry ticket to the professional classes. But automation is beginning to have the same effect on white-collar jobs as it has on blue-collar ones. According to a study from Oxford University, 47% of occupations are at risk of being automated in the next few decades. As innovation wipes out some jobs and changes others, people will need to top up their human capital throughout their lives.
By themselves, these two forces would be pushing change. A third--technology--ensures it. The internet, which has turned businesses from newspapers through music to book retailing upside down, will upend higher education. Now the MOOC, or "Massive Open Online Course", is offering students the chance to listen to star lecturers and get a degree for a fraction of the cost of attending a university.
MOOCs started in 2008; and, as often happens with disruptive technologies, they have so far failed to live up to their promise. Largely because there is no formal system of accreditation, drop-out rates have been high. But this is changing as private investors and existing universities are drawn in. One provider, Coursera, claims over 8m registered users. Though its courses are free, it bagged its first $1m in revenues last year after introducing the option to pay a fee of between $30 and $100 to have course results certified. Another, Udacity, has teamed up with AT&T and Georgia Tech to offer an online master's degree in computing, at less than a third of the cost of the traditional version. Harvard Business School will soon offer an online "pre-MBA" for $1,500. Starbucks has offered to help pay for its staff to take online degrees with Arizona State University.
MOOCs will disrupt different universities in different ways. Not all will suffer. Oxford and Harvard could benefit. Ambitious people will always want to go to the best universities to meet each other, and the digital economy tends to favour a few large operators. The big names will be able to sell their MOOCs around the world. But mediocre universities may suffer the fate of many newspapers. Were the market for higher education to perform in future as that for newspapers has done over the past decade or two, universities' revenues would fall by more than half, employment in the industry would drop by nearly 30% and more than 700 institutions would shut their doors. The rest would need to reinvent themselves to survive.  Read More . . . . . . . . . .

Impact of Online Higher Education - 'Going' (But Not Going) to College

'Going' (But Not Going) to College
September 25, 2014 
How do you tell high school students they’re going to attend -- but not actually go to -- college?
It’s a conversation the University of Florida is having with potential students, parents and school counselors about UF Online, the institution’s degree-granting online arm. Now facing its first full academic year, UF Online is hitting its course development and enrollment targets, but it has so far attracted few first-time-in-college (FTIC) students.
UF Online launched in January with 583 students -- all of them transferring in. In March, university officials said they hoped to enroll 750 to 1,000 students by the fall semester, including 100 to 150 high school graduates starting as freshmen.
“We have not met that expectation,” said W. Andrew (Andy) McCollough, associate provost for teaching and technology at UF. “We have only recruited first-time-in-college students for the first time this fall, and we have a total of 22 out of a class of right about a thousand.”
McCollough, who has served as the interim executive director of UF Online since Elizabeth D. (Betty) Phillips’s sudden resignationtwo months after launch, said time constraints are largely to blame for the low number of first-time-in-college students. Ideally, the university should have marketed to those students last fall, but the institution was then racing to meet its legislature-imposed deadline to launch in January.
“I think a fairer test of the robustness of a fully comprehensive four-year baccalaureate degree for first-time-in-college students would be this time next year, because we are only now getting the opportunity to talk to next year’s class,” McCollough said. “We didn’t really crank [the marketing efforts] up until after applications were due for entry into the university for this fall. We’re up and running this time, and we’ve got not only the digital conversation that Pearson is assisting us with ... we’re also having feet on the ground with our enrollment management people.”
The delayed timeline for recruiting high school students at least means UF Online will have more time to develop the course and degree offerings it hopes will make it competitive. McCollough counted 10 majors (the website lists nine) and more than 130 courses in the fall lineup, saying the university will continue to add five new majors each year.
“I think we’ll be very close at the end of three years to 20 majors,” McCollough said. “One of the things that’s clear to us -- and should come as no surprise to us -- is as we talk to both transfer students and FTICs, we need to have a robust array of major opportunities to be attractive to these possible students.”   Read More . . . . . . . . . . . 

Tuition Costs of Colleges and Universities

          Read More . . . . . . . . 

Gates Foundation Picks Seven To Vie for $20 million Digital Courseware Investments

                     Read More . . . . . . . 

AEFIS - NEW! 2014 Tools For Higher Quality Assessment Success


                        Learn More . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

May 2014 Characteristics of Postsecondary Institutions

In 2012–13, there were 4,295 degree-granting institutions, including 2,609 4-year institutions offering programs at the bachelor's or higher degree level and 1,686 2-year institutions offering associate's degrees. These institutions may be governed by publicly appointed or elected officials, with major support from public funds (publicly controlled), or by privately elected or appointed officials, with major support from private sources (private control). All institutions in this analysis enroll first-year undergraduates. Private institutions may be operated on a nonprofit or for-profit basis. The number of private nonprofit institutions in 2012–13 (1,346) was 3 percent lower than in 2000–01 (1,383), and the number of public institutions in 2012–13 (1,581) was 4 percent lower than in 2000–01 (1,647). In contrast, the number of private for-profit institutions nearly doubled between 2000–01 and 2012–13 (from 687 to 1,368).  Read More . . . . . . . . . .

2014 World Engineering Education Forum

Under the Patronage of

His Highness Sheikh Hamdan bin Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum

Crown Prince of Dubai and Chairman of Dubai Executive Council

Following in the footsteps of WEEF 2010 in Singapore and WEEF 2012 in Buenos Aries, the 2014 World Engineering Education Forum is bringing together a whole array of activities.  The Forum combines a number of international engineering education conferences, and promises to be the largest ever conference on engineering education.


Monday, October 13, 2014

Postsecondary Education Outcome Measures: ED, DOD, and VA

Postsecondary Education Outcome Measures: ED, DOD, and VA
Postsecondary Education Outcome Measures: ED, DOD, and VA
Consistent with Executive Order 13607: Establishing Principles of Excellence and Public Law 112-249: Improving Transparency of Education Opportunities for Veterans, the United States Departments of Education, Veterans Affairs, and Defense have worked together to identify outcome measures that will provide information on available educational programs to support informed decision making about educational choices, especially as they relate to Veterans and service members. This effort was guided by the following set of questions:
  • What does a Veteran or service member need to know when choosing a school?
  • What do agencies, congressional leaders and key stakeholders need to know about the effectiveness of educational benefit programs?
  • How do Veterans and service members perform in different educational programs? 
  • Is there variability in outcomes across institutions for different types of students? 
  • How do affordability and outcomes vary across institutions?
A set of outcome measures are proposed to capture important information on students’ experiences during school, upon completion of a degree or certificate, and post-graduation using existing administrative data.  An additional set of outcome measures that require additional analysis and in some cases data from additional data systems have been identified for further exploration. The following chart lists each measure, with a brief definition of the measure, the cohort or population the measure describes, and an indication of the ability to report the measure. Click on the response for NCES under Departments reporting to see an example of existing data reported at the national level. Following the chart, there is a brief discussion of several overarching measurement issues that will help you understand some of the differences in available information from each of the three Departments.
Click the plus and minus (/) symbols below to expand/collapse the table sections.  read more . . . . . . . . . . 

12 tech trends Higher Education Cannot afford to Ignore

              12 tech trends Higher Education 

                    Cannot afford to ignore

Higher education faces an onslaught of disruptive forces right now—and ​no one should be suprised to hear that news. Burgeoning technologies such as MOOCs and mobile devices are disrupting institutional structures from the classroom and across entire campuses. As tech transforms these learning environments, universities must decide whether to resist the change or get out in front of it. To choose the latter option, however, we need to envision what universities of the future will look like​if they exist at all
Lev Gonick CIO Case Western Reserve University
Lev Gonick, the VP for information technology services and CIO at Case Western Reserve University and CEO of OneCommunity, isn’t afraid of gazing into the proverbial crystal ball.
In his keynote address Tuesday at the Campus Technology 2013 conference in Boston, Mass., Gonick laid out his vision for the future higher ed and campus IT. Read More . . . . . . . . 

4 Technology Trends Changing Higher Education

4 Technology Trends Changing Higher Education

Technology has had a huge impact on the education system worldwide, transforming how students learn, share and gather information.
The adoption of technologies like mobile apps, cloud computing and game-based learning has helped students be more productive. From being consumers, students are now becoming creators and innovators, thanks to technology’s ubiquity.
As universities continue to adopt new technology for higher education, here are some of the future learning trends to expect in the next few years:

Learning Analytics

The New Media Consortium (NMC) defines learning analytics as a “field associated with analysing patterns and trends from big data”. Its primary goal is to help educators develop educational programs to address a student’s needs. Tailor-fit lessons make it easier for teachers to teach effectively and students can now cope with their lessons.
The University of New England developed the Automated Wellness Engine or AWE. It was designed to identify students who were experiencing difficulty with their study programs. This enables the faculty to intervene and read more . . . . . . . 

Trends for 2014: Five Factors Facing Private Higher Education

Trends for 2014: Five Factors Facing Private Higher Education

The Lawlor Group conducts extensive quantitative and qualitative research 
for independent college and university clients throughout the United States. Based on our recent findings, along with other primary and secondary research available to the general public, we’ve identified five trends in the higher education marketplace that we predict will have a significant impact on student recruitment and enrollment efforts during the coming year. We’ve also included several questions that college enrollment and marketing administrators should be asking about their institutions to test how well they are responding to these market trends.


Because of some key demographic projections, the recruitment of traditional-age college students will not get easier anytime soon.
  • College enrollments will grow more slowly. At private institutions, while undergraduate enrollment increased 38% over the past eight years, over the next eight years it will increase only 10% (NCES). [The black line shows average growth in the following chart.]      Read More . . . . . . . . . 

2014 DOE Higher Education Accreditation Processes and Policies

Read More . . . . . . . . . 

   Accreditation in the United States 

The goal of accreditation is to ensure that education provided by institutions of higher education meets acceptable levels of quality. Here you will find lists of regional and national accrediting agencies recognized by the U.S. Secretary of Education as reliable authorities concerning the quality of education or training offered by the institutions of higher education or higher education programs they accredit.  Read More . . . . . . . . 

What is accreditation? 
Accreditation is the recognition that an institution maintains standards requisite for its graduates to 
gain admission to other reputable institutions of higher learning or to achieve credentials for
 professional practice. The goal of accreditation is to ensure that education provided by institutions
 of higher education meets acceptable levels of quality.

What are accrediting agencies? 
Accrediting agencies are organizations (or bodies) that establish operating standards for educational 
or professional institutions and programs, determine the extent to which the standards are met, and 
publicly announce their findings.

Are there different types of accreditation? 
There are two basic types of educational accreditation, one identified as “institutional” and one 
referred to as “specialized” or “programmatic.” Institutional accreditation normally applies to an 
entire institution, indicating that each of an institution’s parts is contributing to the achievement 
of the institution’s objectives, although not necessarily all at the same level of quality.
Specialized accreditation normally applies to the evaluation of programs , departments, or schools 
which usually are parts of a total collegiate or other postsecondary institution. The unit accredited 
may be as large as a college or school within a university or as small as a curriculum within a 
discipline. Most of the specialized accrediting agencies review units within a postsecondary institution
 which is accredited by one of the regional accrediting commissions. However, certain of the specialized 
accrediting agencies accredit professional schools and other specialized or vocational or other 
postsecondary institutions which are free-standing in their operations. Thus, a "specialized" or 
"programmatic" accrediting agency may also function in the capacity of an "institutional" accrediting 
agency.  In addition, a number of specialized accrediting agencies accredit educational 
programs within non-educational settings, such as 
 Read More . . . . . . . .

Technology Defines Much of Higher Education’s New Normal [#Infographic]

Technology Defines Much of
Higher Education’s New Normal [#Infographic]

Today’s college students have more options than their 1980s counterparts had, but their time is also stretched more thinly across the school day.

A lot has changed about the typical college experience over the past 30 years.
A new infographic from Flat World Education highlights the differences in college costs, student demographics and factors affecting work-life balance, among other features of college life, between college students of the 1980s and those of today.
Technology has helped foster growth in the education world, but it has also increased the workload. According to the infographic, two out of three college students today use a smartphone for school work — a capability that didn't exist even 10 years ago, let alone 30. The data also shows that 45 percent of today’s students will take at least one online course, whereas learning in the 1980s was confined to classrooms.
Take a trip back to the Reagan years and see how higher education has changed:
Read More . . . . . . 

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

What Is AEFIS - New! 2014 - At-A-Glance - Higher Quality Assessment - Web Based System

AEFIS - New! 2014 - Higher Quality Education - Web Based Assessment

 AEFIS - Higher Quality Education - Web Based Assessment 
The web-based solution for continuous improvement, learning assessment,
and accreditation knowledge management for higher quality education.

EDUCAUSE *** 2014 Annual Conference Update - NEW! Photos of the Event

EDUCAUSE 2014 Annual Higher Education - IT Conference
Explores Today's Toughest IT Issues Facing Higher Education


AEFIS - Mustafa Sualp - President / CEO
Caitlin Meehan - AEFIS Operations Mgr.

  • 300 Sessions
  • 500 Speakers
  • 60+ webcasts
  • 18 Exclusive Online Sessions Provided Online - Virtually
  • Convenes Some of the Brightest Minds in the Community

    EDUCAUSE Annual Conference

    Virtual Conference

    The EDUCAUSE Annual Conference provides access to its robust program face-to-face and virtually. Gather a team in one room and learn together, or log in individually.
    (Additional logins are available at a reduced rate.)

    Virtual Conference Center Participant Guide and Tutorial: Get tips on how to best use all Virtual Conference Center spaces. This document contains information not on the website.
    To take a quick 4-minute tour, view this video

    Conference Components


    Webcasts of select general, featured, and concurrent sessions available live and on-demand. | Sample Webcast from EDUCAUSE 2013

    Exclusive Online Sessions

    Interactive sessions with current topic experts, available live and on-demand exclusively for the online audience. | Sample Session from EDUCAUSE 2013


    Virtual conference sessions will be available live, and recordings will be posted less than 3 hours after each session ends.

    Private Recordings Page

    Registrants will receive a link to all virtual conference session recordings that they can share with their nonregistered team members.

    Preconference Seminars

    Exclusive online, half-day preconference seminars on Monday, September 29 offer in-depth, highly interactive discussions. (A separate registration and fee are required.)

    Digital Poster Gallery

    Visit the Digital Poster Gallery to view onsite poster presentations.

    Public Webcasts

    The selected sessions below give you a taste of the best thinking in higher education IT that's taking place at this year's EDUCAUSE Annual Conference. You can view these sessions live, or in recorded format. Click on the embedded player under the abstract. Click on CC within the player to see closed captions. [NOTE: Closed Captions will be available about 72 hours after every session ends.]
    Webcasting sponsored by Sonic Foundry, Platinum Partner. 
    All times are listed in Eastern Time. Convert to your time zone.
    Tuesday, September 30
    11:40 a.m.–12:30 p.m. Badging to Support Professional Development and Career Building

    Speakers: Veronica Diaz, Tracy Petrillo and Sondra R. Smith
    Concurrent Session
    3:40–4:30 p.m. Flipping Out over the Flipped Classroom?
    Speakers: Veronica Diaz, Tracy Petrillo and Sondra R. Smith
    Concurrent Session
    Wednesday, October 1
    8:00–8:50 a.m. Gathering No Moss: A Tribute to Followership
    Speaker: Gordon Wishon
    Sponsored by WOWZA Media Systems
    Featured Session
    9:10–10:00 a.m. It Takes a Community: Responding to Developing Leaders
    Community Leadership Award Recipients

    Speakers: Joanne M. Kossuth and Theresa Rowe
    Concurrent Session
    1:30–2:20 p.m. Leaning, Rising, Meandering, Holding: Your IT Career at Different Life Stages
    Rising Star Award Recipient

    Speakers: Katie L. Vale

    AEFIS   877-674-3122

    Concurrent Session

Tuesday, September 23, 2014

WEEF2014 » 2014 World Engineering Education Forum | Dubai 3rd - 6th December 2014

WEEF2014 » 2014 World Engineering Education Forum | Dubai 3rd - 6th December 2014

Your organization will be at the forefront of engineering education professionals at all levels and all segments – corporate and government – including members of the participating organizations from across the world.

Monday, September 8, 2014

Click Here to Complete the 2015 - NCHEA
- National Council for Higher Education Assessment - Survey

2014 - 2022 ☛ Driving Changes in Higher Education Learning and Assessment

2014 Driving Changes in Higher Education Learning and Assessment

Growing Ubiquity of Social Media

Integration of Online and Hybrid

Rise of Data-Driven
Learning & Assessment


Shift to Students as Creators

Agile Approaches to Change
Evolution of Online Learning


National Council for Higher Education Assessment - NCHEA

NCHEA was developed to provide an industry leading thought knowledge center for providing the necessary resources for assessment, on the parts of administrators, faculty, students, alumni and industry, by giving members the complete set of Higher Education Evaluation and Assessment resources in a single source to ensure that both direct and indirect assessment findings are mechanisms for continuously improving educational experiences.

Wednesday, September 3, 2014

Quantified Self : Higher Education New Market Opportunity - Tracking and Measuring Consumers Behaviors and Activities

Quantified Self:
Consumers Self Tracking of Their Behaviors and Actions People have always demonstrated interest in learning about themselves by tracking and measuring their behaviors and activities. Quantified self technologies tap into this interest in the form of mobile apps, wearable devices, and cloud-based services that make the data collection process much easier.

Quantified Self - New Market Growth Opportunity
Quantified self describes the phenomenon of consumers being able to closely track data that is relevant to their daily activities through the use of technology. The emergence of wearable devices on the market such as watches, wristbands, and necklaces that are designed to automatically collect data are helping people manage their fitness, sleep cycles, and eating habits.

New Mobile Applications - Future is Now!
Mobile apps also share a central role in this idea by providing easyto-read dashboards for consumers to view and analyze their personal metrics. Empowered by these insights, many individuals now rely on these technologies to improve their lifestyle and health. Today’s apps not only track where a person goes, what they do, and how much time they spend doing it, but now what their aspirations are and when those can be accomplished.

Capturing Life Every 30 Seconds
Novel devices, such as the Memoto, a camera worn around the neck that is designed to capture an image every half minute are enabling people to track their lives automatically. As more people rely on their mobile devices to monitor their daily activities, personal data is becoming a larger part of everyday life.

Bridge: Quantified Self - Self Actualization
People have always demonstrated interest in learning about themselves by tracking and measuring their behaviors and activities. Students already spend time in formal classroom settings gathering data about themselves or research topics. Quantified self technologies tap into this interest in the form of mobile apps, wearable devices, and cloud-based services that make the data collection process much easier.

Improving Health and Fitness
Popular incarnations of the quantified self movement have materialized in the form of health, fitness, and life streaming tools. The Fitbit, for example, is a small wristband that tracks wearers’ daily activities, including sleep patterns, steps taken, and calories burned.

Real-Time Tracking / Sleep and Diet

Through wireless and automatic syncing between the Fitbit and smartphones, tablets, and laptops, users can see real-time progress across their devices. The Jawbone Up wristband employs similar functionalities, allowing wearers to track sleep, movement, and dietary information that is automatically populated in the accompanying mobile UP app.

New Social Media Opportunity
The experience can easily turn into a social one as people can share their accomplishments with other users and team up to track and achieve specific goals. Other wearables that have garnered worldwide attention have deeply integrated self-tracking tools, including Google Glass and iWatch, but the high prices — and in some cases, the low availability — of these devices have some pundits concerned that quantified self technologies are a luxury for the upper class.

Early Adoption in Higher Education Institutions

The Quantified Self Institute, for example, is an initiative by the Hanze University of Applied Sciences in the Netherlands that brings international and regional partners together to conduct research on different methods of self-tracking. This organization is well positioned to lead the quantified self movement into higher education institutions with recommendations on effective applications.

Relevance for Teaching, Learning, or Creative Inquiry
With the growing use of mobile apps and wearable technology, individuals are creating an exponentially increasing amount of data. The quantified self movement is breaking ground by integrating these data streams in interesting ways. Self quantifiers, for example, can create healthier living plans after monitoring their sleep, exercise, diet, and other important patterns.

People and Pets
The new mobile app Whistle even enables people to do the same for their dogs. It is imaginable that if test scores and reading habits gleaned from learning analytics could be combined with other lifestyle tracking information, these large data sets could reveal how environmental changes improve learning outcomes.

Mobilizing Medical Care
Quantified self technology also has the potential to shape the future of some industries. In the medical field, for instance, doctors are using not only traditional medicine but also data that individuals self-collect, such as heart rate, blood pressure, and sugar levels.

Anticipating Health Problems

Advancements in the field could enable computers to search for patterns and help physicians more accurately diagnose or anticipate health problems before patients step foot into the building. Educators at the moment can only hypothesize about a new era of the academic quantified self, but interest is strong and growing.

Privacy Concerns
One of the current barriers for the mainstream adoption of this technology revolves around privacy concerns. The quantified self movement is about people sharing what they learn about themselves for the greater good, but there is a vulnerability to exposing personal information that will need to be addressed over the next four to five years.

Cost / Benefit Analysis
This could include a cost/benefit analysis about what data should be collected, what data should be shared, who should be responsible for making those decisions, and how to build the most effective and safe online communities of practice.
Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., Freeman, A. (2014). NMC Horizon Report: 2014 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.